SDUF leads discussion on Drug Control Policy

<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif"><b>GANGTOK,:</b> A dialogue on drug control policy in Sikkim, organised by the Sikkim Drug User’s Forum (SDUF) as part of global ‘Support. Don’t Punish’ campaign was held on Friday at Rachna Books, Gangtok, bringing together the members of civil society, the legal fraternity, academia and media.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Forum coordinators Prashant Sharma and Tsewang Gyatso Sherpa outlined the objectives of the dialogue, stating that the discussion sought to encourage a broader conversation on drug policy, harm reduction and public health approaches to substance abuse.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">During the discussion, Prashant Sharma outlined the evolution of international drug control frameworks, referring to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 and the UN Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988. He noted that India, as a signatory to these conventions, had shaped the nation’s drug control law like the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 and The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 in accordance with these frameworks. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Sharma argued that global drug control regimes had been significantly influenced by the powerful countries of the Global North such as United States of America and United Kingdom which were rooted in punitive and retributive approaches. He contended that such measures had failed to effectively address addiction and illicit drug markets, noting that drug related deaths worldwide soared by 36 per cent since 1990.&nbsp; These trends, he contended underscored the need for policies centred on public heath, harm reduction and humanism.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Among those present was Advocate Tashi Rabten Barfungpa, president of the Bar Association of Sikkim, who stressed the need for community-based approach, supported by the State, to address substance abuse. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Barfungpa advocated for focus on decriminalisation and rehabilitation for individuals struggling with addiction, while emphasising the importance of addressing underlying social and economic circumstances that contribute to addiction rather than brute ostracism.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">Participants in the dialogue also emphasised the need for a shift in societal perceptions of addiction, noting that substance dependence continues to be heavily stigmatised. Speakers argued that a distinction should be made between drug use and addiction, stating that existing policies often address both through a blanket approach. The discussion highlighted the importance of treating dependency as health and social issue rather than solely a criminal justice concern. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">The coordinators and participants called for a greater investment in rehabilitation programmes through collaborative efforts between government and civil society organisations. They stressed that rehabilitation should not only focus on recovery by force but also restoring dignity through employment opportunities, social regeneration and community support, free from stigma and discrimination.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span style="font-family:&quot;Georgia&quot;,serif">The dialogue concluded with a call for policy reform and greater voice and involvement of civil society, government executives and law enforcement agencies with a strong will advocating for amendments to the Sikkim Anti-Drugs Act, 2006 arguing that existing framework should place greater emphasis on harm reduction and social reintegration alongside enforcement measures.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

from www.sikkimexpress.com https://ift.tt/v0UBups
via IFTTT

Post a Comment

0 Comments